Skip to Content.

edugain-policy-comments - [edugain-policy-comments] some more comments/questions

edugain-policy-comments AT lists.geant.org

Subject: edugain policy comments

List archive


[edugain-policy-comments] some more comments/questions


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Andreas Åkre Solberg <andreas.solberg AT uninett.no>
  • To: edugain-policy-comments AT geant.net
  • Subject: [edugain-policy-comments] some more comments/questions
  • Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 14:39:03 +0200
  • List-archive: <http://mail.geant.net/edugain-policy-comments>
  • List-id: edugain policy comments <edugain-policy-comments.geant.net>

* Dispute if one SP would like to be published to edugain through more than
one federation... How is this sorted out? Example: Dreamspark, Elsevier.
* What about ProtectNetwork IdP. Allowed or not in eduGAIN?
* XML Extension to data protection profile: what about using entityattributes
instead of a new namespace?
* Document mentions SAML 2.0 as if it was the only protocol supported, but I
cannot find anywhere that SAML 2.0 is actually the required as a protocol, as
a contrast to in example SAML 1.1, OpenID or InfoCard.
* Document mentions Identity Providers and Service Providers, and add
requirements to these roles, but it does not mention other roles; such as
attribute authority.
* The document include alot of fancy experimental metadata extensions that
AFAIK nobody has started using in their own federation (yet). Warning: this
will delay things... [MDattribs] and [IdPDiscovery]

Kind regards,
Andreas

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



  • [edugain-policy-comments] some more comments/questions, Andreas Åkre Solberg, 09/06/2010

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page