Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

edugain-discuss - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Assessment of Sri Lanka / LIAF for eduGAIN membership

edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org

Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

List archive

Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Assessment of Sri Lanka / LIAF for eduGAIN membership


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Vladimir Mencl <vladimir.mencl AT reannz.co.nz>
  • To: Thilina Pathirana - LEARN <thilina AT learn.ac.lk>, edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org
  • Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Assessment of Sri Lanka / LIAF for eduGAIN membership
  • Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 17:03:09 +1200


Hi Thilina,

Sorry, I can't exactly see the changes - could you please let me know what you changed on the website and how it addresses my concerns?

I was expecting (at least some of the issues) to be addressed by a newer revision of the MRPS - so please help me see how they're addressed by the website changes.

Thanks a lot in advance!

Cheers,
Vlad

PS: Not sure if it's part of the website changes, but I now see it's quite hard to see links on the website - they're underlined with a very subtle color style - perhaps this could be made somewhat more visible?


On 9/05/19 22:09, Thilina Pathirana - LEARN wrote:
Dear Vlad,

I have done those changes in the website ( https://liaf.ac.lk ) and can
you please check it.


Thanks

Thilina


On 5/1/19 10:32 AM, Vladimir Mencl wrote:

Hi Thilina,

Thanks for all this work - and sorry about the delay in getting back
to you; just got back from holidays.

I see most of my concerns have been addressed.

However, I still see several are still pending:

(1) Process for membership (Service Providers)

In my earlier assessment (email of March 15th), I pointed out a
mismatch between the MRPS (where section 3 says "The checks are
conducted with a number of official databases including LEARN Member
registry.") and the Federation Policy (where "any party" can join as
Service Provider).

These sections have not changed and it is still not clear how the
legal name of the federation member would be checked.

(2) Entity Management: using email vs FR

This has not changed either - still, the MRPS says changes should be
emailed to noc AT learn.ac.lk, while https://liaf.ac.lk/#join points to
the Federation Registry.


And, federated Login to Federation Registry still gives Internal
Server Error...

(3) Getting the MRPS

Still, the MRPS points to  https://liaf.ac.lk as the authoritative
URL, but one has to navigate through "Join" -> "Federation Registry" -
this is not at all obvious.

(4) And if possible, please make links in the MRPS PDF clickable (had
to select the link text and paste into a browser)


Otherwise, I'm glad to see the progress made - and look forward to
hearing from you on the remaining points.

Cheers,
Vlad


On 10/04/19 17:22, Thilina Pathirana - LEARN wrote:
Dear Vlad and all,

I did some changes to the policy and mrps as per the recommendations
and the unpublished documents are

https://liaf.ac.lk/docs/Identity%20Federation%20Policy%20-LIAF%20v1.1.pdf


https://liaf.ac.lk/docs/MRPS-LIAF1.2.pdf

Please check them and if they are ok then I'll publish them.

Also I have updated the key to 4K and the issue with the
md:EntitiesDescriptor / Name

But I am stuck and will need some advice on updating the pyff script
to add mdrpi:PublicationInfo which gets stripped out during the signing


Thanks,

Thilina

On 3/29/19 6:00 AM, Vladimir Mencl wrote:

Hi Thilina,

Sorry about not getting back to you on this earlier.

On 18/03/19 23:33, Thilina Pathirana - LEARN wrote:
* Section "5. Entity Eligibility and Validation"
    I see this section deviates from the MRPS template, dropping any
mention of IdP scope - both the clause in 5.1, and the whole section
"5.3 Scope Format".

     Was there a particular reason for omitting scope from the MRPS?
I was following the guidelines from
https://wiki.refeds.org/download/attachments/1605645/MRPS-templatev1.pdf?version=2&modificationDate=1516014622994&api=v2

and I am not sure there were any dropped parts. Please advice more
on this.

Ah, I see - you've used a slightly earlier template, while I was
looking at the latest (1.1) - as available e.g. at

https://github.com/REFEDS/MRPS/blob/master/MRPS-templatev1.1.pdf

As the master document is tracked on github, you can see the changes
- the ones I'm referring to are essentially pull request #5:

https://github.com/REFEDS/MRPS/pull/5/files


I'd recommend adjusting to the latest template.

Overall, I'll now leave the feedback with you and I'll wait to hear
from you once the documents are ready for a new round of review.

Cheers,
Vlad


--
Thilina Pathirana
Network/Systems Engineer
Technical Assistance Center (TAC)
Lanka Education And Research Network (LEARN)
T: +94812003036 | M: +94770055755 | F: +94812385715
www.learn.ac.lk  |www.thilinapathirana.xyz



--
Vladimir Mencl
Senior Software Engineer

Research & Education
Advanced Network NZ Ltd

M +64 21 997352
E vladimir.mencl AT reannz.co.nz
www.reannz.co.nz



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page