edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org
Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.
List archive
- From: Alan Lewis <alan.lewis AT geant.org>
- To: Brook Schofield <brook.schofield AT geant.org>
- Cc: Nicole Harris <nicole.harris AT geant.org>, "edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org" <edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org>
- Subject: RE: [eduGAIN-discuss] Your super amazing IAM examples
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:46:37 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=alan.lewis AT geant.org;
Hello Brook,
Thanks for the slides and pointer to the REFEDS minutes. I agree that some examples of what did not work would be useful, and I take your point concerning ‘theoretical’ use cases. If this has already been well explored and no new circumstances exist that would give rise to use cases that are likely to evolve from imagined to real I can see that creating more unicorns might be an unnecessarily futile exercise.
Best regards
Alan
Alan Lewis Trust and Identity Services Product Manager
GÉANT Mobile: +44 (0) 7500 891616 Switchboard: +44 (0)1223 371300 Networks • Services • People Learn more at www.geant.org GÉANT Vereniging (Association) is registered with the Chamber of Commerce in Amsterdam with registration number 40535155 and operates in the UK as a branch of GÉANT Vereniging. Registered office: Hoekenrode 3, 1102BR Amsterdam, The Netherlands. UK branch address: City House, 126-130 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 1PQ, UK.
From: Brook Schofield <brook.schofield AT geant.org>
Alan,
I’d suggest that the things that don’t work are valuable as a lesson of what not to do (and there is a risk that the next generation of federation and identity specialists might repeat history) but there is plenty on our TODO lists that users repeatedly ask for and mechanisms to validate and revisit use cases are more valuable.
When eduGAIN started, because we didn’t have a service, nor users, nor services, nor collaborations we created a range of “example or potential” use cases so that we could build the service based on something.
We hope that this “something” was grounded in reality. Unfortunately many of these use cases outlived their useful life - and we never really validated whether these were real or entirely theoretical.
In my eduGAIN update at the 29th REFEDS meeting I called for: "No more theoretical developments” because too many of these stayed open, never resulted in anything and distracted us from real problems.
See slide #10 at: where I discussed ‘verifiedHornLength’ (but didn’t specific whether SI units would be used nor the precision).
…and the rest of that REFEDS meeting https://refeds.org/meetings/29th-meeting-june-2015
-Brook
|
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- [eduGAIN-discuss] Your super amazing IAM examples, Nicole Harris, 17-Apr-2019
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Your super amazing IAM examples, Alan Lewis, 17-Apr-2019
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Your super amazing IAM examples, Brook Schofield, 17-Apr-2019
- RE: [eduGAIN-discuss] Your super amazing IAM examples, Alan Lewis, 04/23/2019
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Your super amazing IAM examples, Brook Schofield, 17-Apr-2019
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Your super amazing IAM examples, Miroslav Milinovic, 17-Apr-2019
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Your super amazing IAM examples, Nick Roy, 17-Apr-2019
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] Your super amazing IAM examples, Alan Lewis, 17-Apr-2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.