edugain-discuss AT lists.geant.org

Subject: An open discussion list for topics related to the eduGAIN interfederation service.

List archive

Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] [refeds] this is the separate thread on entity-categories vs requiredattributes

From: Leif Johansson <leifj AT sunet.se>
To: "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2 AT osu.edu>, "edugain-discuss AT geant.net" <edugain-discuss AT geant.net>, REFEDS <refeds AT terena.org>
Subject: Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] [refeds] this is the separate thread on entity-categories vs requiredattributes
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:51:45 +0100
List-archive: <https://mail.geant.net/mailman/private/edugain-discuss/>
List-id: eduGAIN discussion list <edugain-discuss.geant.net>

On 2014-10-29 20:46, Cantor, Scott wrote:
> On 10/29/14, 3:08 PM, "Leif Johansson" <leifj AT sunet.se> wrote:
>>
>> This isn't about what the IDP can deliver but what the SP needs.
>>
>> My understanding is that an SP can be in R&S and only need email. In
>> that case it can't request displayName and the IDP can't deliver it.
>
> Is that better rephrased as "it would be nice if the SP could simply not
> request displayName and the IdP know it need not deliver it"?
>
> -- Scott
>
yeah

[eduGAIN-discuss] this is the separate thread on entity-categories vs requiredattributes, Leif Johansson, 29-Oct-2014
- Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] [refeds] this is the separate thread on entity-categories vs requiredattributes, Peter Schober, 29-Oct-2014
  - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] [refeds] this is the separate thread on entity-categories vs requiredattributes, Leif Johansson, 29-Oct-2014
    - Message not available
      - Re: [eduGAIN-discuss] [refeds] this is the separate thread on entity-categories vs requiredattributes, Leif Johansson, 10/29/2014