Skip to Content.

cat-users - Re: [[cat-users]] Installers with certificate

cat-users AT lists.geant.org

Subject: The mailing list for users of the eduroam Configuration Assistant Tool (CAT)

List archive


Re: [[cat-users]] Installers with certificate


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter AT restena.lu>
  • To: Fabian Mauchle <fabian.mauchle AT switch.ch>
  • Cc: "cat-users AT lists.geant.org" <cat-users AT lists.geant.org>
  • Subject: Re: [[cat-users]] Installers with certificate
  • Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:01:49 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=stefan.winter AT restena.lu; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFIplEwBEADTSz+DS8nio+RSvfSLLfaOnCGi1nqpn8Pb1laVUyEvnAAzZ5jemiS88Gxf iDH6hUGlWzcaW0hCfUHGiohr485adbjxRksPngWgAt/1bRxpifsW3zObFjgog01WWQV5Sihl wc4zr8zvYbFA5BJZ6YdkR9C5J015riv5OS30WTjA65SSXgYrb7zJWPwmegTFwE093uBFvC39 waz3xYpVu5j87nO6w2MVQt/8sY2/2BFPEq+xfOajl18UEwc7w8SCgnZdlVNcmEK4UBvJuwS/ 1lsR2JeQa8Gu1EDxC7PRgMgNXsDSWnnBe9aVmfG54+6ILe1QH2dwk9sPBQT5w2+vjijrb3Dv 9ur+1kN+TNU2XE436jVpnnY/3OsLdix30STQn4Q/XOm7YoVMeDwwviefilRxzK0dXA+wKj92 T68Od82CFxuZqPAgBCVmWfQM91iK9piqFK+QP+R3vF6+NGDBdwbe68iVKs0v5L8XmbxBQndj pmo+lo2asmBR2TAIfZHaKdgtBw13u3GPVVKlg/Mpko8ki9JOSem2aFyi3kQEVKptWgXT3POl 97DWJzsR5VyKz6GOx9kJAEISRyLZwm0wqh8+9LCza5oeIKW381lzq1b9x30vOh8CBSQQJ+cG 9ko0yPHAj7Suw2TmPXx1qMctmE6Ahq82ZW30SljdZby8WQuR2wARAQABzTxTdGVmYW4gV2lu dGVyIChSRVNURU5BIGtleSAyMDEzKykgPHN0ZWZhbi53aW50ZXJAcmVzdGVuYS5sdT7CwXkE EwECACMFAlIplEwCGwMHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZj7/ D/99hVS+mJr8dSPCaDaUFFxBiT2eI1LoR8VKEerTCRw5BsdL6pN2eRJZ9NmsqWo1ynWVHEzO 91bNZ+oZGgyoNohcBAI7p+r0qUTzkyqwdZO4kMm0pqKoM9xkP3tf2mjGujKjOz4Y7S7wnz2Z FokeUsecoRVJF/++/qHnmeWLn44J1HUKLHYCjMu+QXGOgGXgz024jQ5eUrnPwzNp0Z90AFVH lWC+bymty/ToIUUCQqS5Ff0jzdWLd8U695OG9iGvjBQT1LdEjsfbAwuKV5UcnpxNqUpUwKa5 9hdX5/2cMZP07FI1UXwnBlxa8rJfdb13FLjSKX4vUUHedYUZMjMPgcwl1a+zGE22lHiSQWgP 8QLA/W3BLsi22ERCEPZBfexOeOtaWIItDIz18fIaQoMDoRPshzar0JI2CzLYsyeKySAtYJEH FVoLmMvhkwzBmgqA/BEswUA67CfCr1jFHRXdpmWM7YkyAmMa9q6LwquWKS5+MXlUXe/3oZUc gpw/T9Uuy3Jo3RdS7B3jFcWaVr6KsO/A9u1gr/aYn5M+iJTQSj4vzqtkQaJTpSspRZoKa66H Zt3IwSYiDiYZqtM83ynuj9kjnZzGfnuTaNIi996q6Mptr33mOzIE1wmMqnJYwTr3EcNtf483 q/qrJwh5ES8Q9xY7aat/ZcSl8fKubW4TlfVr8c7BTQRSKZRMARAAvBPpn7FQq7LQ5glohtbL 6XIEo1U4X67S0TzUYieENSWSVYuWYIhCBldmWdmH8Bpj/qHeqdon7v+SLtR4WngzMR9toupK cFfHnbP9kpazTSB2ySHxXWGX1gJOpPXdCcg9iveKBHEsDn00ThTcPsvtXpnnzET16pXIvOXO 0bxTmVZ4INIF1SWgvYma/g8kBbgXLpkj8tOywBqFiiYPEZlDeCxDHiMgUDh6olda9K/0TZFT dMPUgjKuubfAeaDNCOrVt4RjmFOaRLikcZocmgJhm3z/j25x7/mnNu+0di1H/S67YGQJ+pqC FInzIXDx7aRW2+JCiqsY2X3xOPWZZzjyis5SNnfOcPH3gt2hYz1fy+thsBGf4NgCN01JRqIJ 2/MOQCgUdwh+9l8xqaJvCkUHM4hVh4W62MAe1u7UEqQbvvNEqxM5034vcvlE+/LRkrDCspw+ 2YJ9QyroLerVRwW5DVleP8Ifi8VB3yD80nqXYs9aqRy0BkDNIQ43ERhESMt8dJqrNkxgC6pe mZrhNwyDh+hy2kPNGQh/iBpdKuH1o3E24TIZoV2v3YHvzob7aAYHddE/PofAXhJW7I9mAs+H dWDmnI8ckuPDFpFH+Y/BFGvEXgcnJAJ1wEvf+4LuiIi0MHjR4EWFn9vvoFDAIqD10h3FSd3D 59HGtdSsNn4XaCsAEQEAAcLBXwQYAQIACQUCUimUTAIbDAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZhBtEACL036d djc5pFoYIdoUY1vT8SMXJNquewCnL1quDADzqDZFU5GNlQEy10krSfBwlTb9ahTtE0JFrOdZ wUZtoa1Pgfr8nU6KOgrXPHbNjS/9dyc5CwGVVIpOavIm2CsMVDJ9LCF/NT+u/t1k6eGfHhPV l3dUQyDa/lzc1chKUIVQYQkFmr0A/iXP+29lFCaI+IeyU0bSdZhezDwUROn5vEx+fiPZyHDS hCb+BxJv/o2LQp9JHenCiSbO+ioRZdxgbWfoKBuXOfmSStqMWXas/gZ5vS3xq72LNtKPRxgp jX3P8Zml1XDqpcBau7eK75VKE0Yd06YxnUIsbcEzInUc3uzW/u0DFpXYkMJb0XIvJyUt5yYP KfV13N8kSkPi5pLxm8yuftXMzfgeFMR7nafY3glTVj/TxElzg6xeZNqfC2ZjIbBtZg9ylHU8 u8wwB+dX282crs0R3N9A064C71/cXlBqcjzjlKH2NUIWGxr+od3TXFIFjszSU3NgMPKrWNhF LLwS81MpbkOe73s6aDhS8RDyNucoxtKXriLR+4Xiu4+pyj5ukYP1JqpB3ZobY/XZgCnJMye+ 7xeTpIDJ1LPORxM3NNAElyb26lxAK2P+km+EpI0Zzz6rNSCfg5jYQ474+e/GBgaSG4MlaPoZ +XAfN46u1Xjjv1/AkkA4IA6m5zP5og==
  • Openpgp: id=AD3091F3AB24E05F4F722C03C0DE6A358A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66

Hi,

> I was thinking about operating our own CAT instance for this; but if I do,
> I want to run unmodified CAT code. I agree that it might not be the best
> idea to enable such an interface on the public CAT instance.

The deployment of Managed IdP is of different nature than CAT:

CAT should really be one central instance, knowing about all the
(normal) IdPs in eduroam - because its webpage is a well-known
entrypoint for "everybody" - including Apple KB articles pointing there.

Managed IdP does not have an end-user facing entry point. Users get in
touch with the system only by getting a link to their personal download
page. That's much more friendly towards separate instances: different
instance merely means the link has a different hostname in it. If you
want to run your own server, just do it, there is no usability drawback
in that.

I don't think you'd need any modifications, except maybe a different
skin for the UI frontend to match SWITCH branding. And since we do have
a skin system in place, coding that should be compartmentalised in one
subdir of the UI frontend, i.e. easy.

A little bit of work is of course to marry the system with your own CA
infrastructure in the backend. Current master branch already foresees
the ability to plug different CA backends into the system; that change
is not in the release_2_0 branch though.

> Alternatively, if you can live with becoming a Managed IdP user and with
> leaving the cert generation to us: the existing API allows an NRO
> operator to remote-control all the important aspects of the system down
> to the individual user level. That way, you could create those 100K
> users in the system, issue 100K invitation URLs, make us send them to
> the users via E-Mail or SMS, and have them pick up their eduroam
> credentials with that.
>
> Well, would you be comfortable to have that many MIdP users long term?
> (with several devices per user, I imagine we could reach 1 million
> certificates within a couple of years).

This is something that time will tell. My own stress testing did 1M user
creations and certificates incl. OCSP statements and it took the system
a few hours to get that done (highly parallelised, and with 8 CPU
cores). A million over a few years thus doesn't look terribly daunting.
But we'll see about that when the time has come.

> What I haven’t checked for the managed IdP: I need to use a specific realm,
> routed to our own radius servers, as these will do extensive authorization
> and attribute mapping based on the users shibboleth attributes.

Managed IdP always uses a "base" realm and routes to that. In our
deployment this is @....hosted.eduroam.org but as with everything else
in the system: this is configurable.
> The only limitation here would be non-technical: the soft limit for user
> count in eduroam Managed IdP is going to be 10K users per NRO. More is
> certainly possible, but we'd have to discuss some kind of a paid plan
> for that bulk usage.
>
> Well, operating our CAT instance and using the managed IdP API might also
> be an option. Need to have a closer look.

Don't hesitate to get back to me or the -devel list for deployment
advice. Our own deployment is envisaging 1M users from start (100 NROs x
10K users/NRO cap), and should be easily able to do that on a total of
four not-very-demanding VMs.

Greetings,

Stefan Winter

--
Stefan WINTER
Ingenieur de Recherche
Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et
de la Recherche
2, avenue de l'Université
L-4365 Esch-sur-Alzette

Tel: +352 424409 1
Fax: +352 422473

PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the
recipient's key is known to me

http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66

Attachment: 0xC0DE6A358A39DC66.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page