cat-users AT lists.geant.org
Subject: The mailing list for users of the eduroam Configuration Assistant Tool (CAT)
List archive
- From: Marc Fradin <Marc.Fradin AT imt-atlantique.fr>
- To: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter AT restena.lu>
- Cc: cat-users AT lists.geant.org
- Subject: Re: [[cat-users]] id@realm in the "internal" identity mandatory with Windows ?
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:09:09 +0200
- Authentication-results: prod-mail.geant.net (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=imt-atlantique.fr
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zproxy110.enst.fr 490E082651
- Organization: IMT Atlantique
Hi yes it works fine with your EAP TTLS Plugin GEANTlink (login or
username without @realm , like under Linux), would not it be better to specify that @realm is mandatory at the
end of the installation of a windows profile (PEAP Mschapv2) ,
Greetings,Marc
On 24/08/2018 08:55, Stefan Winter
wrote:
Hello, it seems that under Windows (7,10) it is /mandatory /to specify id*@realm* in the "internal" identity whereas it is not the case under Android or Ios if *anonymous@realm *is set in the profile in this case, is it not necessary to specify it at the time of configuration? The Windows built-in supplicant behaves like that, yes. We can only configure it within its own limits, and not change that behaviour. The root cause is that anon ID configuration in that supplicant only allows you to specify the local part before the @ - the suffix, which is required to be there in eduroam, is inferred from the actual inner identity. Which in turn means the inner identity needs to have the suffix in it. An alternative is to enable the EAP type TTLS on your server, and to let CAT produce TTLS installers - in those, we include our our own EAP plug-in called GEANTlink which doesn't have such an "interesting" limitation. Greetings, Stefan Winter |
- [[cat-users]] id@realm in the "internal" identity mandatory with Windows ?, Marc Fradin, 08/24/2018
- Re: [[cat-users]] id@realm in the "internal" identity mandatory with Windows ?, Stefan Winter, 08/24/2018
- Re: [[cat-users]] id@realm in the "internal" identity mandatory with Windows ?, Marc Fradin, 08/24/2018
- Re: [[cat-users]] id@realm in the "internal" identity mandatory with Windows ?, Stefan Winter, 08/27/2018
- Re: [[cat-users]] id@realm in the "internal" identity mandatory with Windows ?, Marc Fradin, 08/24/2018
- Re: [[cat-users]] id@realm in the "internal" identity mandatory with Windows ?, Stefan Winter, 08/24/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.