cat-users AT lists.geant.org
Subject: The mailing list for users of the eduroam Configuration Assistant Tool (CAT)
List archive
- From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter AT restena.lu>
- To: eduroam CAT Feedback <cat-users AT lists.geant.org>
- Subject: [[cat-users]] fighting people sending invitation tokens to the list
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:40:52 +0200
- Openpgp: id=AD3091F3AB24E05F4F722C03C0DE6A358A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66
Hello,
I have a vague feeling that we discussed this ages ago for the next
version of CAT, but wanted to double-check:
For new institution invitations sent by the fed admin, should we not add
a Reply-To header in the invitation mails so that any replies are
directed towards the responsible fed admin who sent the invitation,
rather than to the general contact list?
My vague feeling is because I have the complete code in master source,
but commented out for no good reason.
Greetings,
Stefan
--
Stefan WINTER
Ingenieur de Recherche
Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et
de la Recherche
2, avenue de l'Université
L-4365 Esch-sur-Alzette
Tel: +352 424409 1
Fax: +352 422473
PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the
recipient's key is known to me
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66
Attachment:
0x8A39DC66.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [[cat-users]] fighting people sending invitation tokens to the list, Stefan Winter, 04/27/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.